How effective are
public demonstrations?
BP Oil spill, Prop 8,
College Students, Random Hippies…
BP Oil Spill. There was
a huge public outrage over that incident. Environmentalist and Animal Rights
Activists were pissed. Fisherman and people who worked at the Seafood section
of Safeway were pissed. Swimmers who had to be rushed to the hospital after
taking a swim in the ocean were pissed (and sick). Dolphin lovers were enraged.
People who hate gas prices were pissed. People who dislike rich-CEOs-who-f* up-and-then-decide-to-go-yachting-the-next-day-without-a-care
were pissed.
And what did people do?
They held Hands Across the Sand. And some singers sang songs and yelled out
that they were pissed. And random actors with the last name Costner rented out
boats to help clean the ocean area. And people gave public demonstrations. And
what was the result of all this?
People forgot about it.
Now nobody really cares
and the government has considered or is currently in the process of underwater
drilling for oil. And technically that wasn’t even the worst oil spill recorded
in history. I don’t know why some people think mixing Oil with Water is a good
idea but it’s not. I also don’t know why a bunch of people gathering together
to complain is commonly conceived of as a solution –it’s not.
I’m reminded of the
crazy that is going on in Europe right now. People terrorizing the streets,
setting things on fire, causing chaos and destruction… It reminds me of this
movie I saw last night called Marie Antoinette. People were starving to death
in France and they came in droves to the royal palace with fire and pitch
forks. Those were people the government took seriously.
So why is it that
public demonstrations today –even though they may be extreme or seem like a
serious effort- do not get the same results, if any, like they use to?
1. Relying On Ineffective Techniques
-Hosting
a rally isn’t enough these days. Large numbers of people aren’t even enough.
The only thing that ever really worked was a United amount of people who were
on the same page –even if it was for different reasons. If you want to change
policies or social settings you have to make it everyone’s priority. You have
to make everyone want it as much as you do. Otherwise it will be an incoherent
mess and the people who could spur change won’t notice even your efforts. You
have to give people a reason to stand.
2. Empty Sentiment
-I
was actually pretty surprised that Prop 8 passed. Elton John, Ellen DeGeneres,
Celebrities In General aren’t exactly powerless forces that are easy to ignore.
But the Church –and not just the Christian church but synagogues and Mormon churches
as well all rallied in Unity against gay marriage. Christians and other
religious groups have been united against gay rights for centuries. It wasn’t
just about the numbers –it was also the strength they had in them. The fact that
they were on the same page –as well as the fact that they held sway for
legislation on some level as well. It’s not enough to appeal to people’s
emotions, sentiments, or even compassion –you have to reach people in office as
well as at home in a way that makes them feel personally effected by the cause.
If they’re a Christian, make them feel judged for supporting gay rights. If
they’re senators make them feel publicly criticized for supporting gay rights,
if they’re a celebrity with religious affiliations make them feel judged for
not standing with the members of their own congregation. Their needs to be
conviction in it for the people who
stand for the cause and fear of rejection for those who stand against it. Peer
pressure at its finest.
And
the fact is if a law were passed taking all first born children under the age
of 12 away from their mothers and have them shipped them off to Russia –no mother
would allow that law to stand longer than a day. They would rally together like
Hell hath no. If a law gets passed that deeply disturbs, enrages, and upsets
free Americans –they will end it. So you can’t always expect people “doing what’s
right” to prevail, you have to first explain why you believe what you believe
is right and make others stand with you on that point.
3. Stupid Demonstrations
Holding
hands across the beach? Really hippies? Really? The thing that’s going to make
the difference between underwater drilling and soaking the ocean in oil is you
holding hands at the beach??? I don’t care how many surfers hold hands in a row
at the beach –it will Not change anything. At best it will raise awareness. Just
because you’re aware of Breast Cancer thanks to and ad doesn’t automatically
mean you just donated $5 to that cause or even cared about it. There are
wayyyyy too many charities, companies, products, celebrities vying for everyone’s
attention.
Some
people make the mistake of being too sentimental –sorry (Sarah McLachlan). Some
people try to act funny and entertaining to get people attention (sorry Rally
to Restore Sanity). But these are ineffective attempts that either leave the
viewer laughing –not donating- or feeling guilt tripped and resentful. Sympathy
means nothing. Empathy is everything.
Other
forms of stupid demonstrations to raise awareness for a cause or cause change
of some sort include those idiots in Europe running around setting things on
fire. Similar demonstrations were held in Oakland, CA not that long ago. It
only causes chaos and disorder. It’s not like that crowd that rallied around
the palace chanting and screaming in Unison. It’s random a**holes running
around like idiots.
I
think the better demonstration was all of those college students standing
against high college loans and charges. They just sat on the ground and didn’t
fight, yell, or cause problems. When they were then sprayed in the eyes by the
police they gained support from people because of the fact they weren’t
technically doing anything wrong.
So what makes for an
effective demonstration? Let’s look to history…
First off there has to
be some sort of a leader. George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther
King Jr., Gandhi… the greatest movements in history all had a centralized
figure people could be led by and focus on that created a sense of unity among
the masses. Any real movement expected to take effect Needs an effective
leader.
People in America –not necessarily
Europe or some other countries –are emotionally oriented. Trying to create a
movement with a bunch of emotionally-oriented people is like trying to organize
anything with a bunch of little kids. Trying to entertain the kids will get
their attention –but won’t necessarily make them behave the way you want them
too. Cooing and cawing them won’t do much either. They need a sense of direction
and they need basic concepts to grasp onto to really understand the point you’re
trying to make. Keep things simple and strait forward. Use emotions as the fuel
to drive the car –not the steering wheel.
Lastly making a bunch of
noise is not the same as being understood. Speak clearly, calmly, and with
great clarity and intent. If you want to be heard and understood empty gestures
and sentiments muddle things. Say what needs to be said –without the fluff. If
people organized in this way they would have effective demonstrations that
might actually accomplish things.
Today a group of
surfers in Malibu decided to raise awareness of the dying coral reefs and
aquatic life. They Paddled for Peace out on their boards into the ocean and
made a giant Peace Sign. A celebrity retweeted it on Twitter –which is how I
heard about it. I even went so far as to go to the website to check it out. And
that’s about it. There wasn’t any clear call to action and even if there was I
don’t think I would have done anything. It’s not that I don’t like the coral
reefs or saving delicate eco-systems, I just wasn’t effectively motivated to do
anything.
No comments:
Post a Comment